ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Test Sample Online - Valid ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Format

IT certification candidates are mostly working people. Therefore, most of the candidates did not have so much time to prepare for the exam. But they need a lot of time to participate in the certification exam training courses. This will not only lead to a waste of training costs, more importantly, the candidates wasted valuable time. Here, I recommend a good learning materials website. Some of the test data on the site is free, but more importantly is that it provides a realistic simulation exercises that can help you to pass the PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam. PremiumVCEDump PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exammaterials can not only help you save a lot of time. but also allows you to pass the exam successfully. So you have no reason not to choose it.

PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic	Details
Topic 1	Managing an ISO IEC 42001 audit program: This section of the exam measures the skills of an AI Compliance Officer and deals with overseeing an entire audit program. It involves managing multiple audits, tracking audit performance, and aligning audit outcomes with broader organizational goals related to AI governance.
Topic 2	Fundamental principles and concepts of an AI management system: This section of the exam measures the skills of an AI Compliance Officer and covers the basic principles of artificial intelligence, including ethical use, trustworthiness, and transparency. It introduces the purpose and importance of having an AI management system in place for responsible AI governance.
Topic 3	Preparing an ISO IEC 42001 audit: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and covers how to plan and prepare for an AI management system audit. It includes creating audit plans, selecting team members, and setting clear objectives to ensure a smooth audit process.
Topic 4	Conducting an ISO IEC 42001 audit: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and focuses on executing the audit according to ISO IEC 42001 guidelines. It includes collecting evidence, interviewing relevant staff, and evaluating compliance with the AI management system standards.
Topic 5	Closing an ISO IEC 42001 audit: This section of the exam measures the skills of an AI Compliance Officer and explains how to complete the audit process. It includes reporting findings, managing nonconformities, and conducting follow-ups to ensure continuous improvement and compliance.
Topic 6	AI management system requirements: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and focuses on understanding the key requirements outlined in ISO IEC 42001. It explains how organizations should structure their AI-related activities and processes to meet compliance standards effectively.

>> ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Test Sample Online <<

Valid ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Format | ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Examcollection

Try our demo products and realize the key advantages coming through our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor products. Our demo products are quite useful for sketching out the real competence of our actual products. You can estimate the real worth of our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor products, once you go through our free trial products. Free demos experience pre determines what you are really purchasing and what benefits you can acquire through our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor products.

PECB ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam Sample Questions (Q64-Q69):

NEW QUESTION # 64
Question:
Which of the following competencies must at least one of the audit team members possess?

A. Teamwork and communication skills
B. Knowledge of the auditee's language
C. Knowledge of the risk-based approach to auditing

Answer: C

Explanation:
At least one member of the audit team must possess knowledge of therisk-based approach to auditing, particularly because ISO/IEC 42001 auditing requires risk-centric evaluation of AI processes.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.2.1emphasizes the importance of arisk-based auditapproach.
* TheLead Auditor Course for ISO/IEC 42001states:"Competency in risk-based thinking is critical for identifying and focusing on AI system risks that could affect the achievement of audit objectives." Reference:ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.2.1; ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Study Guide Module 4 (Risk- Based Auditing).

NEW QUESTION # 65
Scenario 8:
Scenario 8: InnovateSoft, headquartered in Berlin, Germany, is a software development company known for its innovative solutions andcommitment to excellence. It specializes in custom software solutions, development, design, testing, maintenance, and consulting,covering both mobile apps and web development.
Recently, the company underwent an audit to evaluate the effectiveness and compliance of its artificial intelligence management system AIMS against ISO/IEC 42001.
The audit team engaged with the auditee to discuss their findings and observations during the audit's final phases. After evaluating theevidence, the audit team presented their audit findings to InnovateSoft, highlighting the identified nonconformities.
Upon receiving the audit findings, InnovateSoft accepted the conclusions but expressed concerns about some findings inaccuratelyreflecting the efficiency of their software development processes. In response, the company provided new evidence and additionalinformation to alter the audit conclusions for a couple of minor nonconformities identified. After thorough consideration, the audit teamleader clarified that the new evidence did not significantly alter the core conclusions drawn for the nonconformities. Therefore, thecertification body issued a certification recommendation conditional upon the filing of corrective action plans without a prior visit.
InnovateSoft accepted the decision of the certification body. The top management of the company also sought suggestions from theaudit team on resolving the identified nonconformities. The audit team leader offered solutions to address the issues, fostering acollaborative effort between the auditors and InnovateSoft.During the closing meeting, the audit team covered key topics to enhance transparency. They clarified to InnovateSoft that the auditevidence was based on a sample, acknowledging the inherent uncertainty. The method and time frame of reporting and grading findingswere discussed to provide a structured overview of nonconformities. The certification body's process for handling nonconformities,including potential consequences, guided InnovateSoft on corrective actions. The time frame for presenting a plan for correction was communicated, emphasizing urgency. Insights into the certification body's post-audit activities were provided, ensuring ongoing support.
Lastly, the audit team briefed InnovateSoft on complaint and appeal handling.
InnovateSoft submitted the action plans for each nonconformity separately, describing only the detected issues and the correctiveactions planned to address the detected nonconformities. However, the submission slightly exceeded the specified period of 45 days setby the certification body, arriving three days later.
InnovateSoft explained this by attributing the delay to unexpected challengesencountered during the compilation of the action plans.
Question:
Was the audit team leader's attitude appropriate regarding the new evidence provided by the company?

A. No, auditors should consult with the certification body before making any decisions regarding new evidence presented after the stage
B. No, auditors should not take into consideration new evidence or additional information after reaching audit conclusions
C. Yes, auditors should consider the new evidence provided and modify their audit conclusion, if necessary

Answer: C

Explanation:
Auditorsmust remain open to considering additional evidence- even if submitted late - as long as it is relevant and within the audit timeframe.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.4.7states:"The audit team shall reconsider audit conclusions in light of any new, relevant information received before the audit report is finalized."
* TheLead Auditor Guidereinforces:"Evidence-based decision-making must include post-audit review of any additional submissions before certification decisions are made." Reference:ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.4.7; ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Manual - Section 7 ("Handling New Evidence Post-Audit").

NEW QUESTION # 66
What is the main goal of the 'Transparency and Explainability' core element in AI?

A. To make AI operations understandable to users and stakeholders
B. To improve the speed of AI systems
C. To ensure AI systems are user-friendly
D. To reduce the cost of AI development

Answer: A

Explanation:
The principle ofTransparency and Explainabilityis designed to ensure thatusers and stakeholders can understand how AI systems function, how decisions are made, and what data is used.
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 emphasizes that transparency enablestraceability, clarity of design choices, and auditability, while explainability provides insights intohow outputs are generated, especially for high-risk or critical applications.
In practical terms, this principle supports:
* Buildingtrustin AI systems
* Ensuringregulatory compliance
* Facilitatinginformed decision-making
Reference: ISO/IEC 42001:2023 - Clause 6.1.2 (AI risk identification), and 8.2.3 (Operational planning and control) PECB Lead Auditor Guide - Domain 1: "Transparency and Explainability" as a core ethical value of AI

NEW QUESTION # 67
Question:
While preparing for an AIMS audit, a technology company faced an issue: the auditor lacked a required security clearance for accessing sensitive information related to government contracts.
The company requested a replacement auditor. Is this acceptable?

A. Yes, the auditor not holding the security clearance required by the auditee is a valid reason to request the replacement of the auditor
B. No, the auditee can request the replacement of the auditor only if the auditor is in a conflict of interest situation
C. No, the auditee can request the replacement of the auditor only if the auditor has audited the company in the past

Answer: A

Explanation:
It isacceptablefor an auditee to request a change if the assigned auditorlacks necessary security clearancesto perform the audit properly.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 5.2.2requires that auditors must have appropriate competence, including security requirements, for sensitive audits.
* TheLead Auditor Trainingspecifies:"Auditee organizations have the right to request a replacement of auditors if competence (including security clearance) is insufficient for audit scope requirements." Reference:ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 5.2.2; ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Guide Chapter 5 ("Auditor Competence and Replacement").

NEW QUESTION # 68
Scenario 9:
Scenario 9: Securisai, located in Tallinn.Estonia, specializes in the development of automated cybersecurity solutions that utilize AIsystems. The company recently implemented an artificial intelligence management system AIMS in accordance with ISO/IEC 42001. Indoing so, the company aimed to manage its Al-driven systems' capabilities to detect and mitigate cyber threats more efficiently andethically. As part of its commitment to upholding the highest standards of Al use and management, Securisai underwent a certificationaudit to demonstrate compliance with ISO/IEC 42001.
The audit process comprised two main stages: the initial or stage 1 audit focused on reviewing Securisai's documentation, policies, andprocedures related to its AIMS. This review laid the groundwork for the stage 2 audit, which involved a comprehensive, on-site evaluation of the actual implementation and effectiveness of the AIMS within Securisai's operations. The goal was to observe the AIMS in operation,ensuring that it not only existed on paper but was effectively integrated into the company's daily activities and cybersecurity strategies.
After the audit, Roger, Securisai's internal auditor, addressed the action plans devised to rectify nonconformities identified during thecertification audit. He developed a long term strategy, highlighting key AIMS processes for triennial audits. Roger's internal audits play a key role in advancing Securisai's goals by employing a systematic and disciplined method to assess and boost the efficiency of risk management, governance processes, and strategic decision-making. Roger reported his findings directly to Securisai's top management.
Following the successful rectification of nonconformities, Securisai was officially certified against ISO/IEC
42001.
Recently, the company decided to transfer its ISO/IEC 42001 certification registration from one certification body to another despitebeing initially bound by a long-term agreement with the current certification body.
This decision was motivated by the desire to partnerwith a certification body that offers deeper insights and expertise in the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence in cybersecurity.
To ensure a smooth transition and uphold its certification status, Securisai is diligently compiling the required documentation forsubmission to the new certification body. This includes a formal request, the most recent audit report underscoring its adherence toISO/IEC 42001, the latest corrective action plan that highlights its continuous efforts toward improvement, and a copy of its current validcertification registration.
A year following Securisai's initial certification audit, a subsequent audit was carried out by the certification body on its AIMS. The purpose of this audit was to assess compliance with ISO/IEC 42001 and verify the ongoing improvement of the AIMS. The audit team concluded that Securisai's AIMS consistently meets the requirements set by ISO/IEC 42001.
Question:
Roger followed up on action plans resulting from external audits. Is this acceptable?

A. No, the internal auditor should follow up on action plans submitted in response to nonconformities resulting only from internal audits
B. Yes, the internal auditor should follow up on action plans submitted during internal and external audits
C. No, it is the responsibility of the external auditor to follow up on action plans resulting from external audits

Answer: B

Explanation:
It isacceptableand even advisable for internal auditors to monitor bothinternalandexternal audit findingsto ensure the system's ongoing effectiveness.
* ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 9.2.2states:"Internal audits shall ensure the AIMS conforms to both the organization's own requirements and the requirements of the standard, including actions arising from external audits."
* ISO 19011:2018 Clause 5.5allows internal auditors to verify that corrective actions from all sources (internal and external audits) are implemented effectively.
Reference:ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 9.2.2; ISO 19011:2018 Clause 5.5.

NEW QUESTION # 69
......

We will offer the preparation for the ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor training materials, we will also provide you the guide in the process of using. The materials of the exam dumps offer you enough practice for the ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor as well as the knowledge points of the ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam, the exam will bacome easier. If you are interested in the ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor training materials, free demo is offered, you can have a try. And the downloding link will send to you within ten minutes, so you can start your preparation as quickly as possible. In fact, the outcome of the ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam most depends on the preparation for the ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor training materials. With the training materials, you can make it.

Valid ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Format: https://www.premiumvcedump.com/PECB/valid-ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor-premium-vce-exam-dumps.html